According to the author of The Insider Secrets to Marketing Your Business on the Internet Version 2009, the Latest Edition is everything you’d Expect From A Beginner’s Guide To Starting An Online Business with over 1,250 pages of detailed, moneymaking strategies and techniques have been carefully laid out in bite-sized, easy to grab-and-apply sections, making it dead-easy to determine what you need, apply it to your business, and move onto the NEXT step.
The “Insider Secrets” system claims to carefully guide you through all the critical steps:
- Helping you decide what you should sell…
- Easily get a sales website live…
- Attract your first visitor…
- Accept your first credit card payment!
- Ramp up sales & traffic quickly!
- Automate your business to be “hands free”
Course Examples
Here is a small sample of what you will find within The Insider Secrets to Marketing Your Business on the Internet Course…
- How to use powerful automated research tools to quickly multiply your hobbies and interests into HUNDREDS of potential business ideas!
- The simple “measuring stick” that will instantly tell you if your product idea has REAL income potential… before you spend a penny developing it!
- The SEVEN best ways to make money from a website — add each one to your website like building blocks and watch your income explode!
- How to get paid BIG commissions by recommending other people’s products on your website!
- How you can quickly become a “Super Affiliate” and earn a full-time, six-figure income — without EVER selling a product of your own!
- Plugging NEW Revenue Streams into Your Website to Incrementally Build Your Online Income by $1,500 to $8,000+ Per Month!
- Secrets for Squeezing WAY MORE Sales and Profits Out Of Your Existing Traffic, Subscribers, Products, and Website!
Additional Benefits Reported
Here are some additional benefits reported in The Insider Secrets to Marketing Your Business on the Internet course:
- Students receive real time updates with the latest online marketing strategies.
- Streaming videos for ease of student learning.
- Downloadable content for iPod, iPhone or other mobile device.
- The Master Blueprint for Launching and Expanding Your Internet Business is shipped Free to students.
- Foolproof goal-setting DVD and workbook provided to all students.
- A Private 30-Minute Phone Consultation With a Personal eBiz Trainers.
Product Details
Company Information: The Internet Marketing Center has a 12 year long track record of Over-Delivering on their products and providing good customer value.
Product Spefications: Complete guide to starting and growing an internet business in an electronic, web accessible format plust five business building bonuses valued at $443.
Price: $197 after 30 day trial at $2.95
Return Policy: “DOUBLE Your Profits In 1 Year… Or We’ll Pay You $200 Just For Trying!… in addition to a 100% refund of your purchase price.”
Actual Customer Feedback
“The Insider Secrets to Marketing Your Business on the Internet Version 2009 is a must have course for anyone serious about having their own Internet business. If you want to make money online, I highly recommend that you get access to this tremendous online business building course now.”
Shelley Lowery, web-source.net
“There are precious few courses that I can recommend without reservation. Insider Secrets is one of them…highly recommended.”
Kevin Tenzo, warriorforum.com
“I give Insider Secrets VERSION 2009 a perfect 10 out of 10 without hesitation. The Internet Marketing Center continues to be the leader in helping people go from nothing to big money online.”
Valeriu, internetmarketingprofitscenter.com
“We’ve used this course as our blueprint to grow the business to $500,000 per year!”
David Gray, mortgagewatchdog.com.au
“Using all that valuable information, I built my first website which now brings in $300,000 per year in sales, on average!”
Larissa Carrus, airbrushing-made-easy.com
“I can honestly say that I have never had so much fun learning anything in my life!”
Darren Salkeld, down-feather-bedding.com
““Insider Secrets” is the first investment anyone should make in their Internet businesses. It will shave off years of trial and error time, and will also save you a lot of money in the long run, by preventing you from making the kinds of mistakes Corey and Derek made as Internet marketing pioneers. I can’t emphasize that enough. Learn from this system and you’ll be so much further ahead.”
Shawn LeBrun, shawnlebrunfitness.com
“The Insider Secrets to Marketing Your Business on the Internet has been a great tool for me. It is a very comprehensive course. I would recommend this course to anyone who wants to start an online business!”
Taylor Knight, yourparrotplace.com
The way the positive review stack up, you can’t go wrong… especially with that return policy!
Read more reviews of The Insider Secrets to Marketing Your Business on the Internet Version 2009.
No related posts.
Tagged with: Affiliate Marketing • Article Marketing • Email Marketing • Internet marketing • link building • pre-selling • preselling • Product Creation • profit funnel • targeted traffic • traffic generation
Filed under: Affiliate Marketing • archives • Article Marketing • Blog Marketing • Email Marketing • General Online Business • Other Gurus • Product Creation • Reviews • Search Engine Marketing • Web 2.0 • Website Design • Working From Home
Like this post? Subscribe to my RSS feed and get loads more!











![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=5076155a-e9fc-43af-834a-7697c498f18a)


I’ve just gotten into WOM marketing and so I assumed that my knowledge on the subject is limited. After reading this book, however, I came to think that I could be a marketing guru as well. The ideas described in this book could be summarized on three pages and still those pages would not be worth reading! Rules such as: make your message interesting or make it short or make it easy to remember are obvious for all those who are capable to think logically. Others (e.g. Chinese banquet example) are simply ridiculous!
I expected to learn a lot from this book. I learned nothing new. Plus, the book appear to contradict all the rules he lists: it could definitely be shorter and more interesting!
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
4.0 out of 5 stars
A very good Word of Mouth
quick read
A very good Word of Mouth
quick read. The five T’s and the Word of Mouth
Marketing Manifesto is very interesting and simple. Very good insight.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
3.0 out of 5 stars
Modern update to an old classic
Gives a good perspective on what is word of mouth and the challenge to measure it financially (what is the cost if it is free?).
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
This is an excellent book that should appeal to those without a large advertising budget yet desire to improve awareness of their company or themselves. I was particularly intrigued by the concept that word of mouth marketing is measurable yet cannot be bought. Another takeaway: the honesty of the message fuels the growth of it and improves a company’s potential word of mouth success.
I’d highly recommend this book especially to small businesses in need of getting discovered by the desired audience.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
I was disappointed with Twitter Power, especially after reading the many reviews that claimed this book would reveal many techniques for both beginners and pros alike. For anyone that has been using Twitter for more than a couple weeks, this book is really 101. It seems to be geared towards people that have never heard of Twitter or are just getting started. If that’s the case, this book will help you get your feet wet, but it doesn’t shed light on anything you can’t pick up on your own simply by using Twitter for a few days.
Twitter is real time with instant response in most cases, and you’ll find out what works for you and what doesn’t almost immediately. You can also pay attention to the power players and note their approach. The book just points you to the top users on Twitter anyways. Save your money and do a little homework.
I’ve given an extra star because 10% of author proceeds go towards sustainable long term water solutions in developing areas of the globe.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
4.0 out of 5 stars
Good intro to Word of Mouth Marketing – perspective of a Project Manager
If you don’t know much about word-of-mouth marketing, this book is an excellent intro to it. As a Project Manager, I work with several clients in the Sales and Marketing field,…
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Essential tools and case studies
I received an advance proof to review and participate in a WOM experiment, and I am very excited. This revision of an already amazing book comes at the perfect time.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
What my mom told me about Twitter!
Well to tell you the truth – my mom did not have anything to tell me about Twitter.
But what she could not tell me, was totally compensated by Joel Comm in his new…
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
I’ve been following Joel on Twitter for over a year as of writing this. Over that time I’ve seen his Twitter following grow by thousands of followers! Watching this amazing growth and following Joel’s tweets I’ve realized he definitely knows Twitter inside and out. I’m glad he’s finally released all his knowledge and tips into book format.
Just in the the first few chapters Twitter Power covers the basics and potential mistakes I see SO MANY people making with Twitter. It then goes on to cover many other helpful aspects such as how to use Twitter to build your brand, getting help, building a team, applications you can use with Twitter, and more.
I highly recommend reading Twitter power for anyone that uses Twitter and wants to get the most out of it.
Miles Baker
http://www.twitter.com/milesbaker ;
http://www.MarketingWithMiles.com ;
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
The first book to address business potentials of Twitter
Twitter is an on-line micro-blog that allows users to broadcast their status to followers in 140 characters or less – and Twitter users helped broadcast terrorist attacks and some…
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Demystifying Word-of-Mouth
Ahhhhh…..so it’s NOT a good idea to pay people to pretend to like your product? Ahhhh….so buzz is not a mysterious thing? Ahhhh….
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
4.0 out of 5 stars
For a beginner, great. For someone familiar with social media, not so much.
Thanks to the likes of Oprah and all the celebs who are now on Twitter, social media novices are coming to the site in droves. Even my own mother set up an account.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
the revised edition is even better
Other reviewers have talked about the first edition. They have pointed out that the book is a quick read, that a number of the ideas are familiar, but that there is a clarity and…
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
3.0 out of 5 stars
A Good Book, But Almost Same Content like Previous Edition
[...]
Thanks for the author’s reply (Read below). It shows that he is a responsible author and deeply cares about the W.O.M. about him and his books.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Twitter Power
This book has been very helpful and I have started following Joel on twitter. Lots of invaluable information and ideas.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
twitter power “your way” to successful marketing and collaboration
“twitter power” is a simple yet insightful book on mastering another new Web 2.0 technology – collaborative marketing and socialization through mass communication.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Purchased it Twice – Great Read
I purchased this book when it first hit the shelves – liked it a lot. About 6 months ago, this book became extremely relevant to my job, and I have turned my house upside down at…
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Twitter Power=Power To The People
Joel has done it again!
I have many reports and eBooks I have read on using Twitter but Joel has hit the nail on the head.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Thank you, Joel
Once again Joel Comm has explained another internet mystery to this techno-moron in a way that I not only understand the process, but can see the potential.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
5.0 out of 5 stars
Another winner from Joel Comm
This is the 4th book I’ve read by Joel Comm (including one ebook). I have subscribed to Joel’s blog, his TopOne Report and followed him for quite a while.
This comment was originally posted on http://imarketingwatch.com/)”>iMarketingWatch.com
There is one other area where she may be vulnerable that has nothing to do with racism or sexism and has been shown to be a political hot potato for the Dems already. The Second Amendment.
Win or lose, she should be questioned closely to see if she still holds these views…
Sotomayor: Gun Ownership “Unconstitutional”
http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.com/2009/05/sotomayor-gun-ownership.html
“…Sotomayor is a graduate from Princeton University, where her legal theses included Race in the American Classroom, and Undying Injustice: American “Exceptionalism” and Permanent Bigotry, and Deadly Obsession: American Gun Culture. In this text, the student Sotomayor explained that the Second Amendment to the Constitution did not actually afford individual citizens the right to bear arms, but only duly conferred organizations, like the military. Instead of making guns illegal, she argues that they have been illegal for individuals to own since the passing of the Bill of Rights…”
She also had a ruling overturned regarding terrorism suspects.
“…In that case, she determined that suspects captured on the battlefield must receive all rights afforded to American citizens under the Constitution. Her controversial decision was later overturned by an Appellate Court, but still influenced current policy…”
Since the race card is bound to be played to it’s fullest, If it were up to me it would be in areas like these that I would be focusing attention.
wardogs
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Just to let you know, wardogs, The Volokh Conspiracy considers that thesis stuff “highly dubious”.There is no reason to believe this is true. The purported source is “American News Inc.” The link to this alleged news source is dead. In a quick Internet search, I found no such organization.
Further, the text of the article is self-refuting. An undergraduate at an Ivy League school, including Princeton, would write only one thesis. (Perhaps two if she were an exceptionally hard-working double major.) It would be unheard of for a student to write more than three, as the article claims she did. Nor would anyone who actually knew what a Princeton thesis was describe it as a “legal” thesis.
Moreover, Sotomayor was intelligent enough to graduate from Yale Law School Princeton Summa Cum Laude. It is inconceivable that someone of such intelligence (or even of modest intelligence) could have written a thesis asserting that the Second Amendment actually outlawed gun ownership outside of the militia.
Updated update: Commenters explain that Princeton students write two junior papers and one senior paper; only the latter is called a “thesis.” Other commenters point out that her senior thesis was about the Puerto Rican politician Luis Munoz Marin. The blog which created this item has a small tag on the article which says “satire.” Although all of the commenters on that blog seem to have taken the article seriously, as has every other cite to it on the web. People who want to read satire on the web would be better off with Iowahawk, which can be recognized as satire because it is sometimes funny.Looks like someone’s taking everyone for a ride. Too bad when there are ample cases that are verifiable and on record for dissent.
Also, I spent quite a bit of time trying to find a 2002 Sotomayor case about battlefield rights for terrorists… as that struck me as a story that would have made the news big if it happened. I don’t believe it did, and there is nothing on record on such a major decision by a judge.
Lastly, the only real brush with the RKBA had to do with nunchucka and a NY attorney who claimed his rights had been violated in Maloney v. Cuomo. She was part of a panel that issued a per curiam opinion affirming a district court’s rejection of the claim, saying the the Second Amendment does not apply to the states.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
question her hard on isssues as needed,but remember who she is replacing. one lib for another will it make that big a deal.If the repubs need to pick a fight,then the time in my opinon would be for the next candidate,where the balance would change.fwiw,I belive shes not a good pick for the court,unless your a dem. wayyyy to radical.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Sonia Sotomayr is unqualified for a position on the Supreme Court.
She will violate the oath of office if she is sworn in.
She was nominated by President Obama, who routinely violates the oath of office which he made.
President Obama is not a believer in the rule of law. In his view the law applies only to others; he is exempted from the law. He promised that no lobbyists would serve in his Administration. That was false. He has rigged the automobile settlements to favor (grossly) his friends in the UAW. He promised that he would sign no earmarks into law. That has not happened. He has done his best to alienate our traditional allies. He has done his best to befriend our traditional enemies. So our allies are not there for us anymore, and our enemies see weakness which they can take advantage of (see North Korea).
When I was young I was taught that Justice was blind, having regard only for the law and having no regard for the status of plaintiff or defendant.
When I was young I was taught that the Federal role in controlling the currency was to maintain a sound dollar.
Both of these teachings have been superseded.
Money is to be printed as required, without consideration of the assets to back such printing. Justice is to be dispensed by empathy and not by law, making all contracts void.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
The republican party is not being run by “moderates” who have lost their way, who are clueless as to the desires of the base or who have made the mistake of pandering to strictly democrat owned groups. It is in the hands of deliberate traitors, working to sell-out the nation and the American public by destroying the republican party from within.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@MataHarley:
Hmmm, verrrry iterrrresting. Disinformation to demoralize, like Tokyo Rose. “Give up, G.I. Resistance is futile. You cannot win, so why perpetuate the useless slaughter. Give up. Give up.”
They are REALLY ticking me off!
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
I’m not saying it’s racist to question her beliefs, but I do think the GOP is approaching it the wrong way if it says a white male is more qualified. I think Republicans do have some real racial issues (look at their leader, Rush Limbaugh, the head racist) and really need to avoid this sensitive topic if they want any chance of winning our (Hispanics’) votes again. My advice is to just question her based on her beliefs and avoid anything that touches on or even near race.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Mata, thank you for that information. As you said, after researching it more thoroughly I can’t find independent corroboration either. She seems to have (like Obama) left a minimal paper trail even in decisions she was directly involved in.
Even so, it’s an avenue worth exploring. The Second Amendment Foundation has called her nomination “a slap at gun rights and the Second Amendment” in a Forbes article from yesterday. They cite the case of Maloney v. Cuomo as well and she had to do something that appellate courts rarely do which was to ignore a recent Supreme Court ruling. SAF asks:
“…While Democrats in Congress have been making great strides in the gun rights arena, refusing to consider a renewal of the Clinton gun ban, and offering overwhelming bipartisan support for legislation allowing citizens to carry firearms in national parks, President Obama just demonstrated that he prefers judges who oppose Second Amendment rights,” said SAF founder Alan M. Gottlieb.
Incorporation may be taken up by the high court during its next session beginning in October, because attorneys in the Maloney case plan to appeal in late June.
“If the Maloney appeal is accepted by the Supreme Court,” Gottlieb wondered, “would Justice Sotomayor – provided she is confirmed – recuse herself from deliberations?”
Judge Sotomayor has written an opinion that declined to order the release of certain information under the Freedom of Information Act. In one case, according to SCOTUSblog, she wrote that the “unwarranted invasion of privacy” for individuals whose names would be released under an FOIA request outweighed the public interest.
“Would a Justice Sotomayor be just as protective of the privacy rights of concealed carry permit holders if a newspaper wanted to publish that information?” Gottlieb asked. “We hope that during Senate confirmation hearings, someone asks about her positions on incorporation and the privacy rights of gun owners. The Second Amendment needs to be expanded, not eviscerated…”
http://www.forbes.com/feeds/businesswire/2009/05/26/businesswire124996906.html
She also seems to have an unusually high reversal rate on her decisions:
Cases Reviewed by the Supreme Court
http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/05/26/sotomayor.resume/?iref=hpmostpop
• Ricci v. DeStefano 530 F.3d 87 (2008) — decision pending as of 5/26/2009
• Riverkeeper, Inc. vs. EPA, 475 F.3d 83 (2007) — reversed 6-3 (Dissenting: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg)
• Knight vs. Commissioner, 467 F.3d 149 (2006) — upheld, but reasoning was unanimously faulted
• Dabit vs. Merrill Lynch, 395 F.3d 25 (2005) — reversed 8-0
• Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. vs. McVeigh, 396 F.3d 136 (2005) — reversed 5-4 (Dissenting: Breyer, Kennedy, Souter, Alito)
• Malesko v. Correctional Services Corp., 299 F.3d 374 (2000) — reversed 5-4 (Dissenting: Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, Breyer)
• Tasini vs. New York Times, et al, 972 F. Supp. 804 (1997) — reversed 7-2 (Dissenting: Stevens, Breyer)
I couldn’t find anything concrete on a reversal of any decision about detainee’s rights either. However, Glenn Sulmasy, of the Coast Guard Academy’s law faculty, suggests some national-security questions for Judge Sotomayor’s confirmation hearing that I believe should definitely be posed, one of which is the question of the status of detainees and their rights:
5 questions for Supreme Court candidates
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2009/05/25/EDQ517OUM0.DTL
wardogs
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@ Bryan
Sonia Sotomayor said this: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
Now, who is racist?
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@Bryan: I think Republicans do have some real racial issues (look at their leader, Rush Limbaugh, the head racist)Oh goody!
A Wednesday afternoon attack on Rush Limbaugh.
Examples to support your accusation please Bryan.
Examples please.really need to avoid this sensitive topic if they want any chance of winning our (Hispanics’) votes again.Given his history for appointing Hispanic individuals to Cabinet level positions, and his history of nominating Hispanic jurists to the courts can you tell me, in 50 words or less, what you think of President George W Bush.
In addition, I would also like to know in which election(s) did you vote for President GW Bush?
Exit questions:
Which political party actively and vigorously opposed the passage of civil rights legislation?
Which political party featured the KKK at their convention?
Which political party has a Senator currently serving who was a Grand Kleagle in the KKK?
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Fine, ignore my advice at your own peril.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@Bryan:
Why are you ignoring the questions Bryan?
They’ll only get tougher from here.
Bonus Question:
Who has expressed an opposition to Sotomayor based on her Hispanic heritage?
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
psssssst, hey, Brian.
I feel sorry for you that you don’t know any of the answers, so here’s the crib sheet.
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2008/03/dear-democrats-letter-from-lt-colonel.html
Now you should be able to answer all the questioins, and get an “A.”
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Bryan: Something tells me you would prefer Republicans LOSE elections so I’m sure you will understand if I ignore your advice.
If Hispanics are THAT shallow and easily manipulated by the disinformation put out by the Democrats then I pity them.
As for Rush Limbaugh being a racist, I take it you never listen to Rush Limbaugh yet are willing to accept what someone with an agenda says about him.
Judging by your comment it may well be the truth that Hispanics are largely misinformed and easily manipulated.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@yonason:
@Mike’s America:
Poor Bryan found himself ass deep in alligators.
Heh.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Bucko Bryan: I’m not saying it’s racist to question her beliefs, but I do think the GOP is approaching it the wrong way if it says a white male is more qualified. Kindly point out where anyone has said a white male is more qualified.
As to the rest, you give a great example of what a racist and bigot, as well as liar, looks like. And how nice he proclaims himself the spokesperson for all Hispanics…. ahem.
Well delusions of grandeur and belief in self as the chosen one are all new requirements for POTUS, I guess. Perhaps Bryan has himself a great future in his party of class and race divisionists.
As for ignoring your advice at our “own peril”… LOL… OMG, another know it all progressive liberal with “advice” on how to save the GOP (like that’s what they want)…. I think it’s much better stated that we shall just ignore YOU.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Fine, keep dodging the issue.
For GOP’s sake, it should stay out of the racism business. It does not help their bottom line, which is getting elected in areas that are not the Deep South.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Bryan #7: I’m not saying it’s racist to question her beliefs, but I do think the GOP is approaching it the wrong way if it says a white male is more qualified.
Aqua #9: Sonia Sotomayor said this: “I would hope that a wise Latina woman with the richness of her experiences would more often than not reach a better conclusion than a white male who hasn’t lived that life.”
Now, who is racist?
Bryan #11: Fine, ignore my advice at your own peril.
Mata #16: Kindly point out where anyone [GOP] has said a white male is more qualified.
Bryan #17: Fine, keep dodging the issue.
For GOP’s sake, it should stay out of the racism business. It does not help their bottom line, which is getting elected in areas that are not the Deep SouthTypical child of Alinsky you are, Bryan.
You accuse the GOP of saying a white male is more qualified. Aqua points out the only one who has stated superior qualifications based on gender and race is Sotomayor herself… NOT THE GOP.
I ask you to point out any GOPer who has stated a white male is more qualified. No response.
Just who, pray tell, is “dodging the issue” and is actually engaging in the “racism business”? Your side of the fence.
You can talk all day long until your blue in the face, but it won’t change the facts that it is you and Sotomayor who have proved themselves inept bigots.
I suggest you continue on this racist approach at your peril.
Bozo
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@Bryan:
Bryan,
I see that you’ve returned to once again try and pass off the DNC talking points.
Some sites may not be astute enough to recognize your drivel for what it is.
Unfortunately for you, this site is not in that group.
You’ve already been asked multiple questions up to, and including, who is focusing on Sotomayor based on her race.
As of this moment you have not answered any of the questions posed to you.
Seems that you’re the one who is dodging.
I didn’t figure you had the mental acumen or, more importantly, the stones to answer the queries.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
@Bryan: Do you really think that all Hispanics are so easily manipulated by such obvious misstatements and lies?
I hope not.
Otherwise, they deserve to be Democrats.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Just to add on to Mata’s response to Bryan.Aye Chihuahua #12:
Bonus Question:
Who has expressed an opposition to Sotomayor based on her Hispanic heritage?
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Wow!
Why don’t the conservatives keep pushing thier own message, and answer all attacks with conservative priciples?
When all peoples see and hear the message they will come.
The statists arguements are empty.
Wise citizens know our history and can thank the founders.
READ THE BOOK: LIBERTY AND TYRANNY!! Mark Levin
It’s a damm good start
Semper Fi
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Bryan’s talking points are remarkably similar to this guy:
I wonder if Bryan’s close proximity to metro DC has anything to do with that.
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces
Hmmm..
This comment was originally posted on http://www.floppingaces.net/)”>Flopping Aces